Single-family reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill walls house, Italy

From World Housing Encyclopedia


1. General Information

Report: 30

Building Type: Single-family reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill walls house

Country: Italy

Author(s): Maurizio Leggeri, Giuseppe Lacava, Eugenio Viola

Last Updated:

Regions Where Found: Buildings of this construction type can be found in many cities throughout Italy. This type of housing construction is commonly found in urban areas. This type of construction is also present in suburban areas.

Summary: This building type is commonly used for multifamily housing in urban areas of Italy and is particularly common in the region of Potenza (Basilicata). Prior to 1981, this region was not included in the official seismic zonation map of Italy, in spite of the historical evidence. However, after the major earthquake of November 1980, the entire Potenza province was recognized as a seismically prone area. Consequently, seismic considerations were not taken into account for in the building design projects predating the 1980 earthquake. The main load-bearing structure is reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill walls. Many buildings of this type were strengthened using the financial assistance provided by the government. The upgrade typically consists of installing new shear walls and L-shaped columns, and strengthening the foundation.

Length of time practiced: 25-60 years

Still Practiced: No

In practice as of:

Building Occupancy: Residential, 20-49 units

Typical number of stories: 4-10

Terrain-Flat: Typically

Terrain-Sloped: Typically

Comments: Currently, this type of construction is not being built. This building type was common in the cities when the area wasnot offic


2. Features

Plan Shape: Rectangular, solid

Additional comments on plan shape: Typical shape of the building plan is rectangular.

Typical plan length (meters): 20-50

Typical plan width (meters): 12

Typical story height (meters): 3.5-4

Type of Structural System: Structural Concrete: Moment Resisting Frame: Designed for gravity loads only, with URM infill walls

Additional comments on structural system: Gravity: Reinforced concrete frame. Lateral: Originally, the buildings were designed for gravity loads only. Unreinforced masonry infill walls exist as partitions (nonloadbearing elements). The strengthening was carried out after the November 1980 earthquake, in order to incorporate elements of lateral load-resisting system. The upgrade consists of installing new RC shear walls, L-shaped concrete columns and strengthening the foundation (using internal micropiles and external macropiles).

Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems:

Typical wall densities in direction 1: 4-5%

Typical wall densities in direction 2: 4-5%

Additional comments on typical wall densities: The typical structural wall density is up to 5 %. Approximately 0.05 (i.e. 5%).

Wall Openings: The size of door opening is 0.80 m width and 2.00 m height. In the new RC shear walls installed as a part of the upgrade, there is only 1 door opening per apartment. The ratio of door area/shear wall area is approximately 9%.

Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings?: No

Modifications of buildings: The structural upgrade did not modify the building function (the same housing features were preserved after the upgrade).

Type of Foundation: Deep Foundation: Reinforced concrete bearing piles

Additional comments on foundation: For all the buildings built before the 1980 earthquake, without any seismic features, the reinforcement of piles was limited to the first 2.50-3.00 m, for the anchorage to the plinths.Fortunately, foundation collapse was not reported due to very good soil conditions (overconsolidated clay) with resetting of bending moment.

Type of Floor System: Other floor system

Additional comments on floor system: The floor is considered to act as a rigid diaphragm.

Type of Roof System: Roof system, other

Additional comments on roof system: The floor is considered to act as a rigid diaphragm.

Additional comments section 2: When separated from adjacent buildings, the typical distance from a neighboring building is 8-10 meters. Currently, this type of construction is not being built. This building type was common in the cities when the area was not officially in the seismic zone (pre-1980).


3. Building Process

Description of Building Materials

Structural Element Building Material (s) Comment (s)
Wall/Frame Reinforced Concrete Steel 300 Kg/cm.sq. 4400 Kg/cm.sq.
Foundations Reinforced Concrete Steel 300 Kg/cm.sq. 4400 Kg/cm.sq.
Floors Reinforced Concrete Steel 300 Kg/cm.sq. 4400 Kg/cm.sq.
Roof Reinforced Concrete Steel 300 Kg/cm.sq. 4400 Kg/cm.sq.
Other

Design Process

Who is involved with the design process? Engineer

Roles of those involved in the design process: Design for building of this type: by a graduate technician (a college graduate). Structural design: by a Civil Engineer. The structural design of this construction was completely done by a civil engineer. The architects usually design buildings with better aesthetic features (and functionality).

Expertise of those involved in the design process: Graduate technician.


Construction Process

Who typically builds this construction type? OwnerBuilderContractorOther

Roles of those involved in the building process: This construction type is built by contractors. The builder typically lives in a building of this construction type.

Expertise of those involved in building process:

Construction process and phasing: This construction type is built by contractors. The construction of this type of housing takes place in a single phase. Typically, the building is originally designed for its final constructed size.

Construction issues:


Building Codes and Standards

Is this construction type address by codes/standards? Yes

Applicable codes or standards: Italian Code 1971 National ByLaw #1086, November 5,1971 National ByLaw #64, February 2,1974 Ministerial Order January 16,1996

Process for building code enforcement: Building permit is issued if the design documents have been approved by the Building Committee of Town Municipality (Planning and Building Departments) and by the Regional Committee (named #Genio Civile#) for Structural Project.


Building Permits and Development Control Rules

Are building permits required? Yes

Is this typically informal construction? No

Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules? Yes

Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:


Building Maintenance and Condition

Typical problems associated with this type of construction:

Who typically maintains buildings of this type? Owner(s)

Additional comments on maintenance and building condition:


Construction Economics

Unit construction cost: 500 $US/m.sq.

Labor requirements: The construction of a typical load-bearing structure of this type (5-story high) would take from 126 to 180 days for a team of 8-10 persons.

Additional comments section 3:


4. Socio-Economic Issues

Patterns of occupancy: One family per apartment (housing unit). Each building typically has 10-30 housing unit(s).

Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the day: >20

Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the evening/night: >20

Additional comments on number of inhabitants:

Economic level of inhabitants: Low-income class (poor)Middle-income class

Additional comments on economic level of inhabitants: Very Poor: lowest 10%, Poor: lowest 30%, Middle Class: lowest 30% to top 20%, Rich: top 20%. Ratio of housing unit price to annual income: 1:1 or better

Typical Source of Financing: Personal savingsOther

Additional comments on financing: At present time, the Government does not support any new construction of this type.

Type of Ownership: Own outrightUnits owned individually (condominium)

Additional comments on ownership:

Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available? No

What does earthquake insurance typically cover/cost:

Are premium discounts or higher coverages available for seismically strengthened buildings or new buildings built to incorporate seismically resistant features?: No

Additional comments on premium discounts:

Additional comments section 4:


5. Earthquakes

Past Earthquakes in the country which affected buildings of this type

Year Earthquake Epicenter Richter Magnitude Maximum Intensity
1980 Irpinia-Basilicata 6.8 8.7 (MMI)
1990 Potenza 5.4 6.6 (MMI)
1991 Potenza 5 6.0 (MMI)
1998 Pollino-Lauria 5.5 6.75 (MMI)

Past Earthquakes

Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type: The list includes the significant earthquakes in the Basilicata region after this construction practice has started.

Additional comments on earthquake damage patterns:


Structural and Architectural Features for Seismic Resistance

The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 “Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.

The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall.

Structural/Architectural Feature Statement Seismic Resistance
Lateral load path The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation. TRUE
Building Configuration-Vertical The building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1) TRUE
Building Configuration-Horizontal The building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2) TRUE
Roof Construction The roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. TRUE
Floor Construction The floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. TRUE
Foundation Performance There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake. TRUE
Wall and Frame Structures-Redundancy The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. TRUE
Wall Proportions Height-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls); TRUE
Foundation-Wall Connection Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; concrete columns and walls are doweled into the foundation. TRUE
Wall-Roof Connections Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps. TRUE
Wall Openings TRUE
Quality of Building Materials Quality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate). TRUE
Quality of Workmanship Quality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards). TRUE
Maintenance Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber). FALSE

Additional comments on structural and architectural features for seismic resistance:

Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other

Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other

Seismic deficiency in walls: Unreinforced hollow clay tile infill walls Earthquake Damage Patterns: Diagonal (“X”-cracking) and failure see Figure 11 and 12.

Earthquake-resilient features in walls:

Seismic deficiency in frames: Designed for gravity loads only

Earthquake-resilient features in frame:

Seismic deficiency in roof and floors: Designed for gravity loads only

Earthquake resilient features in roof and floors:

Seismic deficiency in foundation:

Earthquake-resilient features in foundation:


Seismic Vulnerability Rating

For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the Seismic Vulnerability Guidelines

High vulnerabilty Medium vulnerability Low vulnerability
A B C D E F
Seismic vulnerability class |- o -|

Additional comments section 5:


6. Retrofit Information

Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions

Structural Deficiency Seismic Strengthening
Pile Foundations Strengthening
RC Columns Strengthening
Deficient Lateral Load-Resisting Capacity Installation of new RC shear walls

Additional comments on seismic strengthening provisions: The initial phase of the seismic upgrade design included the evaluation of the existing building in order to identify seismic deficiencies. Dynamic analysis was performed using the Super ETABS software, and the natural periods of the structure for six different modes. After the strengthening design was performed, the new periods have been calculated, showing that the strengthened building is characterized with a significantly higher stiffness as compared to the original building. A chart showing the the variation of natural vibration periods for the same five-story building before and after the retrofit is illustrated in Figure 20 (corresponding to the building shown in Figures 1, 5 and 7). A similar chart is presented on Figure 21, corresponding to a four-story building shown in Figures 2 and 8.

Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed? Yes. The strengthening has been performed in practice. This type of strengthening assures the protection of the building from seismic effects and improved dynamic response.

Was the work done as a mitigation effort on an undamaged building or as a repair following earthquake damages? Repair and retrofit after the earthquake.

Was the construction inspected in the same manner as new construction? No.

Who performed the construction: a contractor or owner/user? Was an architect or engineer involved? Contractor performed the construction and an engineer was involved.

What has been the performance of retrofitted buildings of this type in subsequent earthquakes? The performance of retrofitted building was excellent in the earthquakes of 1990/1991.

Additional comments section 6:


7. References

  • Censimento ISTAT Popolazione ed Abitazioni Italian Seismic Code (in Italian) 1990
  • I Terremoti Della Basilicata Leggeri,M. Edizioni Ermes, Potenza, Italy (in Italian)

Authors

Name Title Affiliation Location Email
Maurizio Leggeri Eng.(Expert in EQ Engineering) ARCHSTUDIO-GEOCART Via F. Baracca 175, Potenza 85100, ITALY maurileg@tin.it
Giuseppe Lacava Engineer (cooperating) GEOCART Via Ligure 8, Potenza 85100, ITALY geocart@geocart.net
Eugenio Viola Engineer (cooperating) GEOCART Via Ligure 8, Potenza 85100, ITALY geocart@geocart.net

Reviewers

Name Title Affiliation Location Email
Craig D. Comartin President C.D. Comartin Associates Stockton CA 95207-1705, USA ccomartin@comartin.net
Print/export
QR Code
QR Code reports:report_30 (generated for current page)